I just finished listening to the Attention Tech podcast on extending OPML to support Attention. Sounded a bit like the podcast that Alex Barnett and I did last week.
Nick Bradbury actually wrote a piece on this last week which I didn’t have a chance to read yet.
What I propose is that aggregator users and developers have an open discussion about what specific attention data could (and should) be collected by aggregators.
Although there’s a lot of attention data that could be stored in OPML, my recommendation is that we keep it simple – otherwise, we risk seeing each aggregator support a different subset of attention data. So rather than come up with a huge list of attributes, I’ll start by recommending a single piece of attention data: rank.
… simple is good. I’m all for simple.
Beyond rank, what other attention data do you think aggregators should collect?
Rank is a perfect start.
I’d also like the raw numbers. Number of times a feed was viewed. Number of times a story was launched in the browser. Number of times the user had multiple unread stories. This shouldn’t bloat the spec too much I hope. Certainly not a lot of data so file-size shouldn’t be an issue.
I can promise a number of things to encourage this spec moving forward:
- I’ll support OPML with namespaces in the Jakarta FeedParser. This also means that other aggregators (including Rojo) will have support for this in the future.
- I’ll factor this ranking into our TailRank reputation algorithms. I’m not certain the output would be different but it might help TailRank to recommend other feeds for the user.
- I’ll provide a way for TailRank members to export their OPML and retain this data. We don’t have OPML export now but it’s only because I haven’t had the time.
- I’ll ship an API that will allow people to automatically allow people to import OPML into TailRank directly from their aggregator. I plan on blogging this in the future but there’s a lot of cool stuff that can happen here.
This is just a start but it seems like there’s a lot of potential innovation here.












November 23, 2005 at 12:13 am
Sweet.